2016 Representative General Election Data Graphs - Alabama
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
AutaugaPutman31.3%
 
Palmer59.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other9.4%
 


BaldwinPutman0.0%
 
Palmer97.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


BarbourPutman52.7%
 
Palmer42.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.6%
 


BibbPutman22.8%
 
Palmer77.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


BlountPutman9.6%
 
Palmer90.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


BullockPutman78.4%
 
Palmer19.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


ButlerPutman49.1%
 
Palmer47.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.9%
 


CalhounPutman29.6%
 
Palmer70.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


ChambersPutman42.2%
 
Palmer57.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


CherokeePutman16.3%
 
Palmer83.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


ChiltonPutman16.9%
 
Palmer83.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


ChoctawPutman97.9%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


ClarkePutman63.7%
 
Palmer34.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


ClayPutman20.1%
 
Palmer79.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


CleburnePutman12.0%
 
Palmer88.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


CoffeePutman29.8%
 
Palmer54.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other15.5%
 


ColbertPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


ConecuhPutman52.3%
 
Palmer47.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


CoosaPutman34.6%
 
Palmer65.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


CovingtonPutman24.9%
 
Palmer63.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other12.0%
 


CrenshawPutman36.9%
 
Palmer54.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other8.3%
 


CullmanPutman0.0%
 
Palmer99.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


DalePutman33.7%
 
Palmer49.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other16.3%
 


DallasPutman98.7%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


DeKalbPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


ElmorePutman29.6%
 
Palmer57.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other12.9%
 


EscambiaPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


EtowahPutman0.0%
 
Palmer97.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


FayettePutman0.0%
 
Palmer99.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


FranklinPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


GenevaPutman31.4%
 
Palmer49.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other19.2%
 


GreenePutman99.4%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


HalePutman98.4%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


HenryPutman40.4%
 
Palmer44.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other14.8%
 


HoustonPutman36.6%
 
Palmer45.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other18.0%
 


JacksonPutman22.6%
 
Palmer77.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


JeffersonPutman56.5%
 
Palmer43.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


LamarPutman0.0%
 
Palmer99.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


LauderdalePutman30.6%
 
Palmer69.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


LawrencePutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


LeePutman36.4%
 
Palmer63.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


LimestonePutman26.0%
 
Palmer73.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


LowndesPutman98.8%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


MaconPutman82.2%
 
Palmer17.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


MadisonPutman39.6%
 
Palmer60.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


MarengoPutman98.1%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


MarionPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MarshallPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


MobilePutman0.0%
 
Palmer95.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.8%
 


MonroePutman0.0%
 
Palmer97.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


MontgomeryPutman63.2%
 
Palmer34.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


MorganPutman24.1%
 
Palmer75.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


PerryPutman99.2%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


PickensPutman94.7%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.3%
 


PikePutman46.2%
 
Palmer48.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other5.7%
 


RandolphPutman24.1%
 
Palmer75.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


RussellPutman49.4%
 
Palmer50.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


St. ClairPutman15.9%
 
Palmer84.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


ShelbyPutman22.5%
 
Palmer77.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


SumterPutman99.2%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


TalladegaPutman37.1%
 
Palmer62.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


TallapoosaPutman29.2%
 
Palmer70.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


TuscaloosaPutman58.9%
 
Palmer38.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


WalkerPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


WashingtonPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


WilcoxPutman99.1%
 
Palmer0.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


WinstonPutman0.0%
 
Palmer98.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 



National DataGraph for 2016 - Alabama Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved