Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Autauga		0.0%
	Pate	87.9%
		0.0%
	Other	12.1%

Baldwin		0.0%
	Pate	88.6%
		0.0%
	Other	11.4%

Barbour		0.0%
	Pate	85.8%
		0.0%
	Other	14.2%

Bibb		0.0%
	Pate	91.2%
		0.0%
	Other	8.8%

Blount		0.0%
	Pate	93.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Bullock		0.0%
	Pate	71.8%
		0.0%
	Other	28.2%

Butler		0.0%
	Pate	88.7%
		0.0%
	Other	11.3%

Calhoun		0.0%
	Pate	86.4%
		0.0%
	Other	13.6%

Chambers		0.0%
	Pate	85.4%
		0.0%
	Other	14.6%

Cherokee		0.0%
	Pate	94.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Chilton		0.0%
	Pate	93.0%
		0.0%
	Other	7.0%

Choctaw		0.0%
	Pate	83.4%
		0.0%
	Other	16.6%

Clarke		0.0%
	Pate	90.0%
		0.0%
	Other	10.0%

Clay		0.0%
	Pate	93.0%
		0.0%
	Other	7.0%

Cleburne		0.0%
	Pate	94.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Coffee		0.0%
	Pate	90.4%
		0.0%
	Other	9.6%

Colbert		0.0%
	Pate	88.4%
		0.0%
	Other	11.6%

Conecuh		0.0%
	Pate	88.3%
		0.0%
	Other	11.7%

Coosa		0.0%
	Pate	87.6%
		0.0%
	Other	12.4%

Covington		0.0%
	Pate	94.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Crenshaw		0.0%
	Pate	92.5%
		0.0%
	Other	7.5%

Cullman		0.0%
	Pate	93.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Dale		0.0%
	Pate	89.0%
		0.0%
	Other	11.0%

Dallas		0.0%
	Pate	72.4%
		0.0%
	Other	27.6%

DeKalb		0.0%
	Pate	94.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Elmore		0.0%
	Pate	89.1%
		0.0%
	Other	10.9%

Escambia		0.0%
	Pate	90.7%
		0.0%
	Other	9.3%

Etowah		0.0%
	Pate	90.6%
		0.0%
	Other	9.4%

Fayette		0.0%
	Pate	94.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Franklin		0.0%
	Pate	93.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Geneva		0.0%
	Pate	94.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Greene		0.0%
	Pate	71.8%
		0.0%
	Other	28.2%

Hale		0.0%
	Pate	82.5%
		0.0%
	Other	17.5%

Henry		0.0%
	Pate	88.6%
		0.0%
	Other	11.4%

Houston		0.0%
	Pate	87.8%
		0.0%
	Other	12.2%

Jackson		0.0%
	Pate	92.8%
		0.0%
	Other	7.2%

Jefferson		0.0%
	Pate	74.1%
		0.0%
	Other	25.9%

Lamar		0.0%
	Pate	94.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Lauderdale		0.0%
	Pate	88.4%
		0.0%
	Other	11.6%

Lawrence		0.0%
	Pate	88.7%
		0.0%
	Other	11.3%

Lee		0.0%
	Pate	83.0%
		0.0%
	Other	17.0%

Limestone		0.0%
	Pate	84.7%
		0.0%
	Other	15.3%

Lowndes		0.0%
	Pate	76.7%
		0.0%
	Other	23.3%

Macon		0.0%
	Pate	51.5%
		0.0%
	Other	48.5%

Madison		0.0%
	Pate	74.7%
		0.0%
	Other	25.3%

Marengo		0.0%
	Pate	83.7%
		0.0%
	Other	16.3%

Marion		0.0%
	Pate	95.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Marshall		0.0%
	Pate	92.4%
		0.0%
	Other	7.6%

Mobile		0.0%
	Pate	78.9%
		0.0%
	Other	21.1%

Monroe		0.0%
	Pate	87.1%
		0.0%
	Other	12.9%

Montgomery		0.0%
	Pate	67.2%
		0.0%
	Other	32.8%

Morgan		0.0%
	Pate	88.7%
		0.0%
	Other	11.3%

Perry		0.0%
	Pate	71.1%
		0.0%
	Other	28.9%

Pickens		0.0%
	Pate	85.7%
		0.0%
	Other	14.3%

Pike		0.0%
	Pate	87.0%
		0.0%
	Other	13.0%

Randolph		0.0%
	Pate	93.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Russell		0.0%
	Pate	75.9%
		0.0%
	Other	24.1%

St. Clair		0.0%
	Pate	91.0%
		0.0%
	Other	9.0%

Shelby		0.0%
	Pate	84.7%
		0.0%
	Other	15.3%

Sumter		0.0%
	Pate	78.5%
		0.0%
	Other	21.5%

Talladega		0.0%
	Pate	87.2%
		0.0%
	Other	12.8%

Tallapoosa		0.0%
	Pate	91.9%
		0.0%
	Other	8.1%

Tuscaloosa		0.0%
	Pate	82.9%
		0.0%
	Other	17.1%

Walker		0.0%
	Pate	92.9%
		0.0%
	Other	7.1%

Washington		0.0%
	Pate	91.3%
		0.0%
	Other	8.7%

Wilcox		0.0%
	Pate	83.2%
		0.0%
	Other	16.8%

Winston		0.0%
	Pate	94.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

National DataGraph for 2022 - Alabama Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved