1992 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Iowa
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdairLloyd-Jones23.6%
 
Grassley74.0%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other1.8%
 


AdamsLloyd-Jones23.5%
 
Grassley74.3%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other1.6%
 


AllamakeeLloyd-Jones21.9%
 
Grassley75.2%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.3%
 


AppanooseLloyd-Jones32.3%
 
Grassley64.5%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


AudubonLloyd-Jones25.0%
 
Grassley71.6%
 
Boring0.9%
 
Other2.5%
 


BentonLloyd-Jones22.4%
 
Grassley74.9%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other2.5%
 


Black HawkLloyd-Jones29.9%
 
Grassley67.3%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.3%
 


BooneLloyd-Jones28.0%
 
Grassley69.2%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.3%
 


BremerLloyd-Jones20.1%
 
Grassley78.1%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other1.6%
 


BuchananLloyd-Jones21.5%
 
Grassley75.9%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


Buena VistaLloyd-Jones19.7%
 
Grassley77.1%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.6%
 


ButlerLloyd-Jones19.0%
 
Grassley79.0%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other1.5%
 


CalhounLloyd-Jones21.8%
 
Grassley75.2%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.4%
 


CarrollLloyd-Jones23.3%
 
Grassley73.7%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.6%
 


CassLloyd-Jones20.2%
 
Grassley76.6%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.8%
 


CedarLloyd-Jones22.5%
 
Grassley74.8%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


Cerro GordoLloyd-Jones26.7%
 
Grassley70.8%
 
Boring0.7%
 
Other1.7%
 


CherokeeLloyd-Jones18.0%
 
Grassley79.4%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


ChickasawLloyd-Jones20.2%
 
Grassley77.6%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other1.7%
 


ClarkeLloyd-Jones27.9%
 
Grassley68.1%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other3.6%
 


ClayLloyd-Jones25.0%
 
Grassley70.9%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other3.6%
 


ClaytonLloyd-Jones21.0%
 
Grassley75.3%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other3.2%
 


ClintonLloyd-Jones31.2%
 
Grassley65.6%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.8%
 


CrawfordLloyd-Jones19.4%
 
Grassley75.3%
 
Boring1.7%
 
Other3.6%
 


DallasLloyd-Jones27.1%
 
Grassley69.1%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other3.4%
 


DavisLloyd-Jones31.7%
 
Grassley67.0%
 
Boring0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


DecaturLloyd-Jones27.0%
 
Grassley69.2%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other3.6%
 


DelawareLloyd-Jones18.9%
 
Grassley78.4%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


Des MoinesLloyd-Jones40.6%
 
Grassley56.5%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.3%
 


DickinsonLloyd-Jones21.7%
 
Grassley74.6%
 
Boring0.8%
 
Other2.9%
 


DubuqueLloyd-Jones30.3%
 
Grassley67.5%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


EmmetLloyd-Jones27.4%
 
Grassley70.0%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.0%
 


FayetteLloyd-Jones25.0%
 
Grassley72.0%
 
Boring0.7%
 
Other2.3%
 


FloydLloyd-Jones22.0%
 
Grassley72.4%
 
Boring4.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


FranklinLloyd-Jones18.3%
 
Grassley79.4%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other1.7%
 


FremontLloyd-Jones24.7%
 
Grassley71.8%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.2%
 


GreeneLloyd-Jones24.5%
 
Grassley74.0%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other1.3%
 


GrundyLloyd-Jones15.6%
 
Grassley82.1%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other1.8%
 


GuthrieLloyd-Jones25.7%
 
Grassley71.3%
 
Boring0.9%
 
Other2.1%
 


HamiltonLloyd-Jones24.0%
 
Grassley73.0%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.6%
 


HancockLloyd-Jones15.9%
 
Grassley82.4%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other1.3%
 


HardinLloyd-Jones23.6%
 
Grassley74.2%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


HarrisonLloyd-Jones27.3%
 
Grassley70.1%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.3%
 


HenryLloyd-Jones24.1%
 
Grassley73.1%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.5%
 


HowardLloyd-Jones20.5%
 
Grassley77.5%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.6%
 


HumboldtLloyd-Jones18.6%
 
Grassley79.0%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.1%
 


IdaLloyd-Jones16.7%
 
Grassley79.8%
 
Boring0.6%
 
Other2.9%
 


IowaLloyd-Jones18.0%
 
Grassley79.8%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


JacksonLloyd-Jones25.6%
 
Grassley72.0%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.2%
 


JasperLloyd-Jones29.8%
 
Grassley67.4%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other2.6%
 


JeffersonLloyd-Jones17.4%
 
Grassley52.3%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other30.1%
 


JohnsonLloyd-Jones38.2%
 
Grassley58.1%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.4%
 


JonesLloyd-Jones20.8%
 
Grassley76.4%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.3%
 


KeokukLloyd-Jones23.3%
 
Grassley72.9%
 
Boring1.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


KossuthLloyd-Jones20.3%
 
Grassley77.6%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.8%
 


LeeLloyd-Jones44.4%
 
Grassley52.3%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


LinnLloyd-Jones27.2%
 
Grassley69.5%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other3.0%
 


LouisaLloyd-Jones24.9%
 
Grassley72.4%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


LucasLloyd-Jones25.7%
 
Grassley72.3%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other1.7%
 


LyonLloyd-Jones14.2%
 
Grassley83.9%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other1.4%
 


MadisonLloyd-Jones26.3%
 
Grassley69.8%
 
Boring0.8%
 
Other3.2%
 


MahaskaLloyd-Jones22.3%
 
Grassley75.3%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.0%
 


MarionLloyd-Jones27.2%
 
Grassley70.5%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.0%
 


MarshallLloyd-Jones28.1%
 
Grassley69.5%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other2.1%
 


MillsLloyd-Jones21.8%
 
Grassley72.8%
 
Boring1.0%
 
Other4.4%
 


MitchellLloyd-Jones19.6%
 
Grassley78.6%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other1.3%
 


MononaLloyd-Jones22.0%
 
Grassley75.0%
 
Boring0.9%
 
Other2.0%
 


MonroeLloyd-Jones27.4%
 
Grassley69.0%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.3%
 


MontgomeryLloyd-Jones20.3%
 
Grassley76.4%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.9%
 


MuscatineLloyd-Jones27.5%
 
Grassley68.5%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other3.5%
 


O'BrienLloyd-Jones13.8%
 
Grassley83.6%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.2%
 


OsceolaLloyd-Jones14.9%
 
Grassley82.4%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.4%
 


PageLloyd-Jones16.7%
 
Grassley81.2%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other1.9%
 


Palo AltoLloyd-Jones23.6%
 
Grassley73.4%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.5%
 


PlymouthLloyd-Jones17.7%
 
Grassley78.6%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.3%
 


PocahontasLloyd-Jones18.4%
 
Grassley78.4%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other2.8%
 


PolkLloyd-Jones30.2%
 
Grassley66.6%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other3.0%
 


PottawattamieLloyd-Jones31.4%
 
Grassley65.1%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other3.1%
 


PoweshiekLloyd-Jones29.8%
 
Grassley67.4%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.4%
 


RinggoldLloyd-Jones21.3%
 
Grassley76.2%
 
Boring0.1%
 
Other2.4%
 


SacLloyd-Jones17.2%
 
Grassley79.9%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.4%
 


ScottLloyd-Jones30.7%
 
Grassley65.9%
 
Boring0.7%
 
Other2.6%
 


ShelbyLloyd-Jones22.1%
 
Grassley73.8%
 
Boring1.1%
 
Other3.0%
 


SiouxLloyd-Jones7.8%
 
Grassley90.9%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.1%
 


StoryLloyd-Jones31.1%
 
Grassley65.6%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


TamaLloyd-Jones21.6%
 
Grassley76.2%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


TaylorLloyd-Jones21.4%
 
Grassley76.9%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other1.4%
 


UnionLloyd-Jones26.2%
 
Grassley70.7%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


Van BurenLloyd-Jones27.9%
 
Grassley69.8%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.9%
 


WapelloLloyd-Jones39.4%
 
Grassley57.2%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other3.1%
 


WarrenLloyd-Jones30.1%
 
Grassley66.5%
 
Boring0.8%
 
Other2.6%
 


WashingtonLloyd-Jones23.0%
 
Grassley74.5%
 
Boring0.4%
 
Other2.2%
 


WayneLloyd-Jones29.3%
 
Grassley69.1%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.3%
 


WebsterLloyd-Jones29.6%
 
Grassley67.2%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other2.7%
 


WinnebagoLloyd-Jones21.0%
 
Grassley69.6%
 
Boring2.0%
 
Other7.4%
 


WinneshiekLloyd-Jones22.1%
 
Grassley74.6%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other3.0%
 


WoodburyLloyd-Jones25.2%
 
Grassley72.4%
 
Boring0.2%
 
Other2.2%
 


WorthLloyd-Jones20.4%
 
Grassley78.3%
 
Boring0.5%
 
Other0.8%
 


WrightLloyd-Jones22.9%
 
Grassley75.4%
 
Boring0.3%
 
Other1.4%
 



National DataGraph for 1992 - Iowa Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved