Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Abbeville	Hutto	36.5%
	Graham	56.5%
	Ravenel	4.7%
	Other	2.3%

Aiken	Hutto	31.4%
	Graham	62.4%
	Ravenel	2.9%
	Other	3.4%

Allendale	Hutto	74.9%
	Graham	23.1%
	Ravenel	1.0%
	Other	1.0%

Anderson	Hutto	23.6%
	Graham	66.8%
	Ravenel	6.0%
	Other	3.6%

Bamberg	Hutto	67.8%
	Graham	29.9%
	Ravenel	1.3%
	Other	0.9%

Barnwell	Hutto	51.2%
	Graham	46.1%
	Ravenel	1.5%
	Other	1.1%

Beaufort	Hutto	33.2%
	Graham	62.4%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	2.3%

Berkeley	Hutto	38.3%
	Graham	53.7%
	Ravenel	4.3%
	Other	3.6%

Calhoun	Hutto	54.4%
	Graham	42.0%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	1.4%

Charleston	Hutto	44.5%
	Graham	48.7%
	Ravenel	3.5%
	Other	3.4%

Cherokee	Hutto	27.2%
	Graham	63.3%
	Ravenel	6.1%
	Other	3.4%

Chester	Hutto	46.5%
	Graham	47.9%
	Ravenel	3.7%
	Other	1.9%

Chesterfield	Hutto	42.6%
	Graham	53.0%
	Ravenel	2.9%
	Other	1.4%

Clarendon	Hutto	54.0%
	Graham	42.7%
	Ravenel	2.3%
	Other	1.0%

Colleton	Hutto	45.3%
	Graham	49.4%
	Ravenel	3.8%
	Other	1.5%

Darlington	Hutto	49.5%
	Graham	46.5%
	Ravenel	2.6%
	Other	1.4%

Dillon	Hutto	49.8%
	Graham	46.1%
	Ravenel	3.1%
	Other	1.0%

Dorchester	Hutto	37.9%
	Graham	53.9%
	Ravenel	4.3%
	Other	3.9%

Edgefield	Hutto	39.7%
	Graham	54.6%
	Ravenel	2.8%
	Other	3.0%

Fairfield	Hutto	59.5%
	Graham	36.2%
	Ravenel	2.9%
	Other	1.5%

Florence	Hutto	46.2%
	Graham	48.8%
	Ravenel	3.2%
	Other	1.8%

Georgetown	Hutto	40.7%
	Graham	54.6%
	Ravenel	2.9%
	Other	1.8%

Greenville	Hutto	27.5%
	Graham	60.3%
	Ravenel	6.0%
	Other	6.1%

Greenwood	Hutto	34.7%
	Graham	59.7%
	Ravenel	3.3%
	Other	2.3%

Hampton	Hutto	63.9%
	Graham	33.2%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	0.8%

Horry	Hutto	28.4%
	Graham	65.7%
	Ravenel	3.5%
	Other	2.4%

Jasper	Hutto	52.8%
	Graham	43.4%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	1.6%

Kershaw	Hutto	37.2%
	Graham	57.5%
	Ravenel	3.2%
	Other	2.1%

Lancaster	Hutto	34.4%
	Graham	60.9%
	Ravenel	2.3%
	Other	2.5%

Laurens	Hutto	31.7%
	Graham	57.4%
	Ravenel	7.0%
	Other	3.9%

Lee	Hutto	67.1%
	Graham	30.3%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	0.6%

Lexington	Hutto	26.2%
	Graham	66.0%
	Ravenel	4.3%
	Other	3.5%

McCormick	Hutto	44.8%
	Graham	52.3%
	Ravenel	1.4%
	Other	1.5%

Marion	Hutto	62.3%
	Graham	34.9%
	Ravenel	2.1%
	Other	0.8%

Marlboro	Hutto	58.9%
	Graham	37.7%
	Ravenel	2.4%
	Other	0.9%

Newberry	Hutto	34.5%
	Graham	59.9%
	Ravenel	3.7%
	Other	1.9%

Oconee	Hutto	19.2%
	Graham	73.2%
	Ravenel	5.2%
	Other	2.5%

Orangeburg	Hutto	73.1%
	Graham	25.3%
	Ravenel	0.9%
	Other	0.6%

Pickens	Hutto	18.6%
	Graham	70.4%
	Ravenel	6.2%
	Other	4.8%

Richland	Hutto	59.8%
	Graham	35.8%
	Ravenel	2.5%
	Other	1.9%

Saluda	Hutto	33.6%
	Graham	61.7%
	Ravenel	3.1%
	Other	1.6%

Spartanburg	Hutto	29.4%
	Graham	58.9%
	Ravenel	6.5%
	Other	5.3%

Sumter	Hutto	54.5%
	Graham	41.7%
	Ravenel	2.4%
	Other	1.5%

Union	Hutto	38.6%
	Graham	51.8%
	Ravenel	7.2%
	Other	2.4%

Williamsburg	Hutto	66.3%
	Graham	31.1%
	Ravenel	1.7%
	Other	0.8%

York	Hutto	32.4%
	Graham	60.2%
	Ravenel	3.0%
	Other	4.3%

National DataGraph for 2014 - South Carolina Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved