Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Appling	Martin	32.0%
	Chambliss	65.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Atkinson	Martin	40.5%
	Chambliss	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Bacon	Martin	28.1%
	Chambliss	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Baker	Martin	51.5%
	Chambliss	46.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Baldwin	Martin	52.8%
	Chambliss	44.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Banks	Martin	24.9%
	Chambliss	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Barrow	Martin	28.7%
	Chambliss	66.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Bartow	Martin	30.2%
	Chambliss	65.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Ben Hill	Martin	47.4%
	Chambliss	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Berrien	Martin	32.3%
	Chambliss	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Bibb	Martin	56.5%
	Chambliss	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Bleckley	Martin	34.1%
	Chambliss	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Brantley	Martin	24.8%
	Chambliss	71.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Brooks	Martin	40.7%
	Chambliss	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Bryan	Martin	30.7%
	Chambliss	65.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Bulloch	Martin	41.6%
	Chambliss	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Burke	Martin	54.5%
	Chambliss	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Butts	Martin	37.2%
	Chambliss	59.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Calhoun	Martin	61.1%
	Chambliss	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Camden	Martin	35.6%
	Chambliss	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Candler	Martin	40.7%
	Chambliss	56.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Carroll	Martin	35.3%
	Chambliss	60.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Catoosa	Martin	26.8%
	Chambliss	70.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Charlton	Martin	32.0%
	Chambliss	65.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Chatham	Martin	54.7%
	Chambliss	42.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Chattahoochee	Martin	57.4%
	Chambliss	39.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Chattooga	Martin	43.0%
	Chambliss	53.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Cherokee	Martin	23.8%
	Chambliss	71.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Clarke	Martin	60.6%
	Chambliss	35.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Clay	Martin	61.7%
	Chambliss	36.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Clayton	Martin	80.9%
	Chambliss	16.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Clinch	Martin	39.4%
	Chambliss	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Cobb	Martin	42.4%
	Chambliss	53.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Coffee	Martin	39.3%
	Chambliss	58.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Colquitt	Martin	32.8%
	Chambliss	64.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Columbia	Martin	28.4%
	Chambliss	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Cook	Martin	39.3%
	Chambliss	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Coweta	Martin	29.8%
	Chambliss	66.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Crawford	Martin	38.8%
	Chambliss	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Crisp	Martin	40.8%
	Chambliss	57.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Dade	Martin	31.1%
	Chambliss	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Dawson	Martin	19.6%
	Chambliss	75.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Decatur	Martin	41.1%
	Chambliss	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

DeKalb	Martin	75.9%
	Chambliss	21.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Dodge	Martin	39.1%
	Chambliss	58.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Dooly	Martin	50.8%
	Chambliss	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Dougherty	Martin	64.1%
	Chambliss	34.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Douglas	Martin	50.3%
	Chambliss	46.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Early	Martin	48.7%
	Chambliss	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Echols	Martin	27.7%
	Chambliss	68.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Effingham	Martin	28.9%
	Chambliss	67.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Elbert	Martin	42.3%
	Chambliss	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Emanuel	Martin	40.8%
	Chambliss	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Evans	Martin	40.9%
	Chambliss	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Fannin	Martin	30.7%
	Chambliss	64.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Fayette	Martin	33.9%
	Chambliss	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Floyd	Martin	36.7%
	Chambliss	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Forsyth	Martin	20.0%
	Chambliss	75.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Franklin	Martin	31.6%
	Chambliss	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Fulton	Martin	63.4%
	Chambliss	33.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Gilmer	Martin	28.7%
	Chambliss	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Glascock	Martin	29.2%
	Chambliss	68.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Glynn	Martin	37.1%
	Chambliss	59.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Gordon	Martin	30.2%
	Chambliss	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Grady	Martin	37.4%
	Chambliss	60.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Greene	Martin	41.9%
	Chambliss	55.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Gwinnett	Martin	42.8%
	Chambliss	53.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Habersham	Martin	24.5%
	Chambliss	70.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Hall	Martin	26.4%
	Chambliss	68.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Hancock	Martin	79.4%
	Chambliss	19.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Haralson	Martin	28.2%
	Chambliss	66.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Harris	Martin	31.0%
	Chambliss	65.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Hart	Martin	38.8%
	Chambliss	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Heard	Martin	31.5%
	Chambliss	64.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Henry	Martin	45.8%
	Chambliss	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Houston	Martin	40.3%
	Chambliss	57.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Irwin	Martin	39.9%
	Chambliss	57.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Jackson	Martin	24.4%
	Chambliss	70.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Jasper	Martin	36.7%
	Chambliss	59.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Jeff Davis	Martin	31.1%
	Chambliss	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Jefferson	Martin	57.5%
	Chambliss	41.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Jenkins	Martin	50.7%
	Chambliss	47.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Johnson	Martin	39.0%
	Chambliss	59.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Jones	Martin	39.9%
	Chambliss	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Lamar	Martin	38.7%
	Chambliss	58.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Lanier	Martin	37.4%
	Chambliss	60.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Laurens	Martin	41.8%
	Chambliss	56.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Lee	Martin	27.7%
	Chambliss	69.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Liberty	Martin	64.1%
	Chambliss	33.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Lincoln	Martin	40.3%
	Chambliss	57.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Long	Martin	44.5%
	Chambliss	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Lowndes	Martin	43.6%
	Chambliss	54.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Lumpkin	Martin	28.4%
	Chambliss	65.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

McDuffie	Martin	43.3%
	Chambliss	54.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

McIntosh	Martin	48.9%
	Chambliss	48.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Macon	Martin	64.2%
	Chambliss	34.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Madison	Martin	31.6%
	Chambliss	64.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Marion	Martin	49.8%
	Chambliss	46.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Meriwether	Martin	49.4%
	Chambliss	47.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Miller	Martin	33.6%
	Chambliss	63.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Mitchell	Martin	49.4%
	Chambliss	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Monroe	Martin	36.9%
	Chambliss	60.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Montgomery	Martin	37.5%
	Chambliss	60.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Morgan	Martin	35.0%
	Chambliss	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Murray	Martin	34.1%
	Chambliss	61.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Muscogee	Martin	59.6%
	Chambliss	37.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Newton	Martin	51.0%
	Chambliss	45.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Oconee	Martin	27.5%
	Chambliss	68.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Oglethorpe	Martin	37.8%
	Chambliss	58.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Paulding	Martin	31.6%
	Chambliss	64.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Peach	Martin	52.9%
	Chambliss	45.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Pickens	Martin	25.0%
	Chambliss	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Pierce	Martin	20.4%
	Chambliss	77.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Pike	Martin	23.7%
	Chambliss	72.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Polk	Martin	37.4%
	Chambliss	58.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Pulaski	Martin	42.1%
	Chambliss	55.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Putnam	Martin	35.9%
	Chambliss	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Quitman	Martin	57.1%
	Chambliss	40.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Rabun	Martin	34.7%
	Chambliss	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.8%

Randolph	Martin	56.7%
	Chambliss	41.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Richmond	Martin	64.0%
	Chambliss	33.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Rockdale	Martin	54.1%
	Chambliss	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Schley	Martin	31.3%
	Chambliss	66.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Screven	Martin	50.2%
	Chambliss	47.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Seminole	Martin	43.0%
	Chambliss	54.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Spalding	Martin	41.6%
	Chambliss	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Stephens	Martin	33.0%
	Chambliss	63.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Stewart	Martin	62.2%
	Chambliss	36.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Sumter	Martin	51.4%
	Chambliss	46.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Talbot	Martin	65.1%
	Chambliss	31.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Taliaferro	Martin	64.8%
	Chambliss	33.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Tattnall	Martin	36.2%
	Chambliss	61.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Taylor	Martin	46.5%
	Chambliss	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Telfair	Martin	51.5%
	Chambliss	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Terrell	Martin	54.6%
	Chambliss	43.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Thomas	Martin	40.0%
	Chambliss	57.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Tift	Martin	36.4%
	Chambliss	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Toombs	Martin	35.5%
	Chambliss	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Towns	Martin	30.8%
	Chambliss	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Treutlen	Martin	43.6%
	Chambliss	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Troup	Martin	41.4%
	Chambliss	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Turner	Martin	45.6%
	Chambliss	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Twiggs	Martin	57.1%
	Chambliss	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Union	Martin	32.2%
	Chambliss	63.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Upson	Martin	37.7%
	Chambliss	59.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Walker	Martin	30.1%
	Chambliss	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Walton	Martin	25.3%
	Chambliss	70.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Ware	Martin	32.0%
	Chambliss	66.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Warren	Martin	58.4%
	Chambliss	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Washington	Martin	54.5%
	Chambliss	44.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Wayne	Martin	35.4%
	Chambliss	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Webster	Martin	51.5%
	Chambliss	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Wheeler	Martin	42.8%
	Chambliss	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

White	Martin	25.5%
	Chambliss	68.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Whitfield	Martin	32.4%
	Chambliss	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Wilcox	Martin	40.0%
	Chambliss	58.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Wilkes	Martin	48.7%
	Chambliss	49.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Wilkinson	Martin	53.9%
	Chambliss	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Worth	Martin	36.0%
	Chambliss	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Georgia Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved